Active Properties

First Class Real Estate Services, Cliff Daniels

Browsing Posts tagged Colorado

Bryan Ellis, of the Bryan Ellis Real Estate News Letter located at

  • Bryan Ellis News letter link
  • is a wealth of Real Estate information. You can also sign up to have the newsletter delivered to you
    via e-mail.

    Is it possible to use data about past real estate transactions to predict future real estate trends?

    I suspect my answer will surprise you, but probably won’t satisfy you.

    Allow me to explain it to you like this: Meteorologists know that weather is highly predictable. Given the right amount of data at the right time, it’s possible for the computer models available today to predict with a reasonably high degree of accuracy and certainty exactly what weather will be like in a specific local area. It’s not perfect, but it’s pretty good a lot of the time.

    The same thing is true of real estate. Given the right type and amount of data, it is, I believe, quite possible to make reasonably accurate predictions about the future direction of a particular real estate market.

    But also like the weather, the amount of data that’s necessary to make those predictions accurately is nearly impossible to have in a timely manner. In the case of weather, the problem is that too much data is necessary. In the case of real estate, the problem is that the data is not available quickly enough.

    There are several services that purport to use real estate data to predict future market directions. While there is some legitimacy to the fundamental idea of using statistical analysis to analyze real estate data, I still can’t help but think of these services as the real estate version of a Ouija board or a “Crystal Ball”, because they generally require a substantial leap of blind faith.

    Here’s an example: One “Crystal Ball” service with which I am extremely familiar purports to have many years of market data divided into local markets according to MSA (“metropolitan service areas” are geographic divisions that separate the country into population centers around large cities). This service uses some fairly simple analysis tools to establish trend lines which the promoters claim can allow users to get a very good reading on the direction of the markets within a particular MSA.

    Theoretically, this makes sense. I’m familiar with the nature of the analysis techniques used by this service (and others like it) and the mathematics behind it is sound.

    But despite the soundness of the mathematics, there remain two big problems:

    * Timing Is Everything – If you’re making a decision about an entry to or exit from the real estate market today, you need fresh real estate data. But none of the Crystal Ball services with which I’m familiar provide data that’s any more recent than 90-180 days old. Data that is as much as 6 months old is nearly worthless for helping you to pick an investment today for two reasons: (1) Markets can change a lot in 3-6 months, and these changes are never reflected in the Crystal Ball services [my own local market has dropped off by 12 percent in the past 3 months, and this decline would never be reflected in these "Crystal Ball" services]; and (2) Data from “closed sales” used by the Crystal Ball services reflect negotiations and agreements that were put into place [usually] at least a month or more before the sale closed, so while the data being analyzed by the Crystal Ball services may be 3-6 months old, the market conditions reflected by that data is even older, rendering the analysis provided even more questionable.
    * “Invisible” Markets: Recall that many Crystal Ball services divide their data into “MSA’s”. A typical example is the Atlanta, Georgia MSA which includes all of Atlanta and all of the suburbs around Atlanta. The Atlanta MSA has, on the whole, been declining quite aggressively in recent years, and so if you rely on a Crystal Ball service that uses MSA’s, you’ll have the impression that the Atlanta market is a horrible danger zone. However, there are literally dozens of local real estate markets in the Atlanta MSA, and several of them have been consistent and substantial winners during the past several years. The net effect is that since most of the Crystal Ball services aren’t able to show data at a level any more granular than MSA’s, the best opportunities will not be apparent to you. In other words, fundamentally all of the “diamonds in the rough” will go unseen by the Crystal Ball services.

    Obviously, there’s a problem with the Crystal Ball services. But is there any value to them?

    If you’re strictly a buy-and-hold investor, the Crystal Ball services can give you a reasonably decent starting point for selecting markets that have clear trends in place. But that’s where the usefulness ends, and even that is questionable since the data being used by these services is quite old by the time you receive it.

    While I really like the idea of using statistical analysis to make sense of the real estate market, the Crystal Ball services with which I am familiar simply fall short, and probably for reasons that really aren’t their fault. Nevertheless, if a service can’t really help you to pick local markets (not MSA’s) and also can’t help you to time your entry/exit in a smart manner, I can’ recommend that you pay for such services.

    Therefore, our presentation recommendation is for you to pass on the paid services, and use free ones like:
    * HousingTracker
    * Zillow Local Info
    * Realty Sniper
    These services have similar weaknesses to the “Crystal Ball” services, but they have similar benefits as well. Plus, they’re all free.

    Article from Land Title-

    Several federal agencies and the attorneys general of all 50 states have initiated investigations based on allegations that banks failed to review foreclosure documents properly or submitted false statements when they foreclosed on properties. The allegations first arose in the 23 states that require a judicial foreclosure. Several of the largest mortgage lenders in the U.S. have suspended foreclosure proceedings in some or all states. While some lenders have resumed foreclosures in certain states, the uncertainty caused by the controversy has created a chilling effect on foreclosure transactions across the nation.

    Colorado is somewhat insulated from the foreclosure controversy since the majority of foreclosures conducted in our state are completed through our unique Public Trustee system. The Colorado foreclosure process differs from most other states in that the Governor appoints a Public Trustee for each county. The Public Trustee’s Office is a statutory mediator in the Colorado foreclosure process. Judicial foreclosure is employed only when no power of sale clause is included in the deed of trust or there is a defect in that requires judicial oversight.

    The types of documents at issue in the judicial foreclosure states are not required to complete a sale through the Public Trustee.

    The Public Trustees are dedicated to fairness for all parties in the foreclosure process. The Public Trustees, by law, serve as the neutral, intermediate party between the lender and the borrower to assure that each party can exercise its legal rights in a foreclosure action:

    Foreclosures are conducted by the Public Trustee’s office on a deed of trust containing a power of sale (right to sell property at public auction in the event of default).

    •The procedure for conducting the foreclosure is set by statute and must be followed precisely.
    •The deed of trust is an agreement between three parties: the Grantor (owner), the Public Trustee (who has the power of sale) and the Beneficiary (lender).
    •It is the responsibility of the Public Trustee’s office to ensure that the owners, junior lienors and lenders understand the Public Trustee’s process and to ensure that each party complies with the statutes.
    This is opposed to a judicial foreclosure, where a mortgage is an agreement between two parties, the Mortgagor (owner) and the Mortgagee (lender). Since no power of sale clause is included in the security instrument the lender must sue the borrower and obtain a court order to foreclose.

    It is business as usual at Land Title. We have always thoroughly examined foreclosure proceedings appearing in the chain of title. Our underwriters are not currently requiring any blanket requirements or exceptions.